Weekly Wilson - Blog of Author Connie C. Wilson

Welcome to WeeklyWilson.com, where author/film critic Connie (Corcoran) Wilson avoids totally losing her marbles in semi-retirement by writing about film (see the Chicago Film Festival reviews and SXSW), politics and books----her own books and those of other people. You'll also find her diverging frequently to share humorous (or not-so-humorous) anecdotes and concerns. Try it! You'll like it!

Thought for the Day

Me, pondering thoughts like these while listening to Ron Paul at the Rally for the Republic in Minneapolis’ Target Center, with Barry Goldwater Jr., Jessie Ventura and Tucker Carlson all onstage at once. After that, the German Libertarians libertarianism and legalizing hemp to me. In German. So, I’m thinking this little aphorism about life can be illustrated with just about anything, and this is it.

A professor stood before his philosophy class and had some items in front of him. When the class began, he wordlessly picked up a very large and empty mayonnais…e jar and proceeded to fill it with golf balls. He then asked the students if the jar was full. They agreed that it was.

The professor then picked up a box of pebbles and poured them into the jar. He shook the jar lightly. The pebbles roll
ed into the open areas between the golf balls. He then asked the students again if the jar was full. They agreed it was.

The professor next picked up a box of sand and poured it into the jar. Of course, the sand filled up everything else. He asked once more if the jar was full.. The students responded with a unanimous ‘yes.’

The professor then produced two Beers from under the table and poured the entire contents into the jar effectively filling the empty space between the sand.The students laughed..

‘Now,’ said the professor as the laughter subsided, ‘I want you to recognize that this jar represents your life. The golf balls are the important things—-your family, your children, your health, your friends and your favorite passions—-and if everything else was lost and only they remained, your life would still be full. The pebbles are the other things that matter like your job, your house and your car.. The sand is everything else—-the small stuff.

‘If you put the sand into the jar first,’ he continued, ‘there is no room for the pebbles or the golf balls. The same goes for life.

If you spend all your time and energy on the small stuff you will never have room for the things that are important to you.

Pay attention to the things that are critical to your happiness.

Spend time with your children. Spend time with your parents. Visit with grandparents. Take your spouse out to dinner. Play another 18. There will always be time to clean the house and mow the lawn.

Take care of the golf balls first—-the things that really matter. Set your priorities. The rest is just sand.

One of the students raised her hand and inquired what the Beer represented. The professor smiled and said, ‘I’m glad you asked.’ The Beer just shows you that no matter how full your life may seem, there’s always room for a couple of Beers with a friend.

New Orleans in December: “Writers for New Orleans” Gather at Hotel Monteleone

The Blues Brothers (Dan Ackroyd and John Belushi) statues at Midway Airport, upon departure.

I left Chicago’s Midway Airport bound for New Orleans about 3 p.m. today, Wednesday, December 12th.

the Blues Brothers statues, dancing, at Midway Airport.

New Orleans Airport.

I took a seat in the third row from the front. My seatmate, who had nailed down the aisle seat, was an elderly lady with a cane, who did not seem happy about having a seatmate, even though we had an empty seat between us. (I was merely looking for space in the overhead bins). We also had a dog onboard (!) yapping in his or her cage.
Arrived at the New Orleans Airport near Rush Hour. All I can say is that the New Orleans airport has a lot in common with LaGuardia, if you’ve ever flown from it.

Hotel Monteleone Lobby.

Now, I’m at the Hotel Monteleone in the French Quarter, and spent some time in the bar making friends with the locals.

John Smith on the eve of his birthday.

The gentlemen in the top hat, John Smith, is a card trick and Elvis impersonator who is having his birthday tomorrow. A native of Colorado, he was a dealer in Vegas for many years downtown and also began his Elvis impersonating there. He moved to New Orleans and is scheduled to sing at the Hard Rock Cafe (as Elvis) in January. John has also had bit parts in several films, including the recent “Looper” and the most distant film with Kevin Costner dressed as an Elvis impersonator involved in robbing a casino.

Bernie & friends.

I spoke with a couple from Chicago introduced to me by “Bernie” who is pictured here with her girlfriends. Bernie also introduced me to ANOTHER couple, also from Chicago, and when he said his last name was Stompanato, I had to ask. Yes, Johnny Stomapanato (Lana Turner’s ill-fated boyfriend) WAS a relative.

Mike Dapolo and Anita Shah in New Orleans.

The young couple pictured here, Anita Shah and Mike Dapolo, were on vacation..maybe even their honeymoon, although that may well be a different couple. People kept sitting down and then drifting off and they were from Idaho and elsewhere.

New Orleans, me, important data, Christmas tree.

Finally, here is one of me, ready to go forth and do something worthwhile, in front of the gorgeous Christmas trees.

First Reviewer on New Tour Weighs in on “The Color of Evil”

As mentioned in this space, “The Color of Evil” and/or “Hellfire & Damnation II” are going on a Virtual Tour effective December 10th (four days from this posting). The novel (first of four) “The Color of Evil” will be FREE December 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 as part of the tour.

One of the first reviewers, jumped the gun and posted a review on Amazon Kindle.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R2WFEFEVU49HZL/ref=cm_cr_dp_title?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B006WNOZ5U&channel=detail-glance&nodeID=341677031&store=digital-text

If you don’t want to click away from this page to see what Miss Suzanne Mann had to say, here are a few excerpts:

“Connie Wilson is an author I had never encountered before. Where she has been hiding, I have no idea…The author does a wonderful job of keeping this story active. Every time I stopped reading, I felt myself hankering to get back to the book to see what would happen next. There is a lot of suspense and some gruesome, gory moments that keep the reader enthralled…The last chapter was brilliantly written. Short and to the point—quite shocking really, because the reader is slammed with details about the main characters that they perhaps did not know. At the present moment, I am impatiently waiting to find out what is happening with the characters I have become so attached to! If you like horror (of the type that can really happen!) , then you will enjoy this book immensely. It is an extremely well-written book.”

Gee. Thanks, Suzanne. And if you read this, contact me to become a BETA reader for “Red Is for Rage,” which should be out no later than February, 2013. Just write me at [email protected]. And all the rest of you, who have not (yet) read “The Color of Evil,” your chance to read it for FREE is to download it either to your Kindle or to your computer on December 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

Some Blog Tour Stops for “The Color of Evil” & “Hellfire & Damnation II” in December

“The Color of Evil” will be FREE on December 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, just in advance of the release after the first of the year of the second book in “The Color of Evil” series, entitled “Red Is for Rage.”

Be sure to download it for free on those dates and keep your eyes peeled for Book 2 in what looks like it is going to be a four-book series.

The Color of Evil and Hellfire and Damnation II Virtual Book Publicity Tour Schedule

Monday, December 10

Interviewed at Digital Journal

Interviewed at Review From Here

Review at FreeBookDude.com (COE)

Tuesday, December 11

Book reviewed at Emeraldfire’s Bookmark

COE reviewed at ZombieACRES.com

Interviewed at The Writer’s Life

Wednesday, December 12

Book reviewed at Emeraldfire’s Bookmark

Interviewed at Broowaha

Thursday, December 13

Interviewed at American Chronicle

Interviewed at As the Pages Turn

Friday, December 14

Interviewed at Literal Exposure

Interviewed at Pump Up Your Book

December 17

“H&D II” reviewed at My Cozie Corner”

December 18

“H&D II” reviewed at My Cozie Corner

December 19

“H&D II” reviewed at A Girl and Her Kindle

December 20

“H&D II” reviewed at Cabin Goddess

December 21

COE reviewed at Mallory Heart Reviews

“The Next Big Thing” Connects Writers & Answers the Question: What Are You Writing Now?

I was invited by fellow author and HWA and ITW member Brian Pinkerton to participate in this blog Q&A about the new book (or books) we are working on.

I am supposed to link to 5 other authors.

Yesterday, I took part in a Southpark Mall (Moline, IL) signing with 15 authors present, and I distributed the directions to many of the authors present. None took me up on it, but I’m waiting for Cathy Scott to get back to me. Aside from Cathy, who does not live in this remote area on the border of Iowa and Illinois, and possibly Cathy Mitchell (who lives in Canada), I spent a fair amount of time explaining what a Virtual Tour was to three of the authors present, so it is perhaps not too surprising that nobody jumped at my offer to participate in The Next Big Thing.

So, far, I have ZERO authors to link to, but I would like to give credit to Brian Pinkerton, whose novel “Rough Cut” is truly good(yes, I have read it, and I liked it), and whose new one (which he writes about on the Goodreads blog below) is, no doubt, equally good.

Here is a link to Brian’s post:

http://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/3330032-tag-i-m-it

And author Cathy Scott will be posting on this blog the first week in December: http://www.womenincrimeink.com/

Question 1: What is the working title of your book?

The working title of the second book in a 4-book series is “Red Is for Rage.” The first book, “The Color of Evil,” came out in paperback in March and is the winner of an E-book Award from Jenkins group, as well as a Silver Feather from IWPA (Illinois Women’s Press Association). The second book in the series is “Red Is for Rage.” There will be two more books, the way I have it currently planned.

Question 2: Where did the idea for your book come from?

The basic story premise of a small boy with the power to see “auras” around others that tell him whether someone is good or evil was contained within a short story in my first “Hellfire & Damnation” collection, which won an ALMA (American Literary Merit Award) award. Tad McGreevy can see colors around others and, at night, he has nightmares in which he vividly relives the crimes of the evil-doers. However, he has no way to harness this power and it is not necessarily “predictive,” as he doesn’t know if the crimes are happening now, about to happen, or have already occurred in the past. The original story title was “Puffer-Fish.” That was changed to “Living in Hell” when I used the story within the first of my “Hellfire & Damnation” (www.HellfireAndDamnationTheBook.com) series. I felt guilty at leaving Tad in a bad place, so I decided to jump him forward 8 years from his 8th birthday party ( he is completely recovered and is a junior in high school) and give him a fighting chance to survive in this battle of Good versus Evil.

Question 3: What genre does your book fall under?

My book is variously classified as dark suspense, thriller or horror. I prefer dark suspense. It is a YA (Young Adult) novel aimed at older teenagers who are at least juniors in high school or older and on into the early twenties. It is currently “recommended” on a preliminary ballot in the YA Novel category for the Bram Stoker (R) which means nothing, since there are many others similarly “recced.” Still, it is nice to know that someone liked the book, and I was interviewed by Cyrus A Webb for his radio show, indicating he had read (and enjoyed) the book. I am currently a member of both ITW (International Thriller Writers) and HWA (Horror Writers Assocation).

Question 4: What actors would you choose to play your characters in a movie rendition?

I would let the casting directors find fresh, young new talent. This is a novel about high school-aged protagonists and I’m sure there are plenty of new Megan Foxes and Tara Reids just dying to play a role like Tad McGreevy (the hero), or Jenny SanGiovanni (his blonde crush) or Stevie Scranton (a role not unlike Stifler in “American Pie”).

First proposed cover, some of which has been cut off…no idea why.

Question 5: What is the one-sentence synopsis of your book?

“Carrie” meets television’s “The Medium” meets “The Fury.”

Question 6: Will your book be self-published or represented by an agency?

I am represented by AAA Agency (Nancy Rosenfeld) of Chicago, but the last book I self-published after a major house sat on it for ONE FULL YEAR, so I’m inclined to self-publish the sequel, as well. I’ve already contracted for the cover art, and I’d really like readers to let me know which of the two covers I picture here is “best.” Write me back and let me know which one you prefer. Both are by Paula Phanback, who is working with me on the covers for the remaining books in the series.

Question 7: How long did it take you to write the first draft of your manuscript?
It took me about a year to write “The Color of Evil” and I’m 15,000 words from being “done” with “Red Is for Rage.” Since the best output I can hope for is 4,000 words a day, I have to finish “Ri4R” before we get on a plane and fly to Sydney to visit our daughter in Australia and New Zealand. That is January 12th, so the second book will be done in a year, also, and out in early 2013 (some time in Jan/Feb./March). The Beta readers are poised and my editor is standing by.

Question 8: What other books would you compare this story to within your genre?

I can only report that reviewers have compared my writing to Philip K. Dick, Stephen King and Dean Koontz. I am trying to write the way I write, and to do the best job I can do, after teaching writing for 33 years, so I’m just trying to be the best “me” I can be. (Which sounds like an Army recruitment slogan!). I do not have any other book I can point to that reminds me of this, except, as mentioned, the “Carrie,” “The Fury” type plots of early King.

This is Proposed Cover #2. Let me know which you prefer. I am not sure why it is cutting off some of the cover (the part with my name, mainly) but if it is just losing my name, it is a small loss.)

\Question 9: Who or what inspired you to write this book?

I taught writing for 33 years at various colleges and at the junior high school level, and I started writing for my hometown newspaper (the Independence Bulletin Journal & Conservative) at the age of ten. I am very familiar with students this age and with the area in which the book is set (Cedar Falls, Iowa and towns nearby) plus I interviewed Sam Amirante (John Wayne Gacy’s attorney) for various quirks of serial killer John Wayne Gacy’s speech, since there is a Killer Clown in the story that Tad inadvertently meets on the occasion of his 8th birthday party.
I’ve also had 5 students on Illinois’ Death Row at the same time, so I have a pretty good feeling for the less desirable students and how they might act and think. Plus, I grew up in a small town in Iowa that housed the largest mental institute in the state (Independence Mental Health Institute).

Someone once said to me, upon learning this, “You were just born to write this stuff, weren’t you?” I laughed, and then I thought about it and answered, “I guess so.”

Question 10: What else about your book might pique the reader’s interest?

If what I’ve written above doesn’t pique your interest and you aren’t interested after visiting www.TheColorOfEvil.com, you probably aren’t my audience, but keep reading. There are other writers I may be linking to who write completely different things. And please be advised that THE COLOR OF EVIL will be FREE as a Kindle download on Amazon on December 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

I should also add that my writing does not dwell on gore for the sake of gore. It is more psychological horror, a la Hitchcock, with “Sixth Sense” endings something I strive for in short stories. You might wish to try reading the 99 cent short story “The Bureau” online (e-book) or the collection of short stories just out, “Hellfire & Damnation II,” which has received good reviews, if you’re not willing to commit to the long haul with Tad McGreevy and friends in 4 novels. There’s also a lot in the book about tetrachromacy, whcih I will not attempt to explain here, but let’s just say it’s something that has just been discovered and was fascinating to me when I learned about it.

Reasons Why Obama Won & Mitt Lost: Two Liberals Discuss, Post-Election

1) The technical wizardry and knowledge of the young Obama workers far outstripped the more pedestrian team working for Romney, just as it overpowered the Clinton candidacy in 2008. (Look for Obama to “help” Hillary to run, should she gear up, in 2016, and that will be all it will take, even if we don’t “like” Hillary as well. She has proven herself competent and that Ryan runt will be all over the next nomination for the Republicans as will Christie and Rubio.)

Rubio has the charisma factor. Ryan, for me, does not.He failed to carry his home state and his own home town (Janesville, WI). Nor did Ryan “work” for the millions of baby-boomers who feared what he would do to what have been dubbed “entitlement programs.” Hillary’s choice of a VP will be crucial in 2016. It will have to be a man with singular experience in government and someone relatively young, in order to corral the youth vote. (If not Hillary, who?)

2) Sandy, the storm: Was there ever a luckier event in terms of politics, for showing across-the-aisle bi-partisan working together-ness? When the Republican Governor comes out and embraces the Democratic President, how sweet is that? Mitch McConnell, on the other hand, personifies the dug-in prejudices that have mired us in stasis for half of Obama’s first term. I look for him to find a way around this aggravation, as much as he can.

3) Obama is a once-in-a-generation figure. He has “it,” that indefinable charismatic cool. He is calm under pressure, smart, and he was voted as being more “in touch” by 53% of the nation (as opposed to 43% for Romney).

Dear Connie (from friend Pam), in response:

1) I do think that barring anything really unusual happening, Hilary has an excellent change to become president in 2016. I don’t think the Republicans will run anyone who can match her. They have good candidates, Chris Christie for one. However, I think he is too independent and moderate for the Republican hierarchy (Think of his recent praise for President Obama after super storm Sandy. What real conservative would have said one kind word about our president?)

I don’t think Paul Ryan has broad enough appeal to win a national election. His budget was a give-away to the rich and a complete take- away for the poor. There are more poor people in this country than there are rich people— WAY more. Will the Republicans really run a Hispanic candidate? An Indian? Maybe, but how would that play in the Deep South and the border states? (What would Rush say? Or do, he’d probably have a melt-down not unlike his poor treatment of the young woman who attempted to testify before Congress about a woman’s right to choose.

2) I agree that the choice of VP for Hillary is critical. It has to be someone with a lot going for him (definitely a man). However, he can’t overshadow Hillary. If he does, that would make her look weak. She certainly is not weak, but remember how the press pounced on her tearing up during the primary campaign in 2008? That hurt her a lot, I thought. (*Note: I thought it humanized her, but this is a good friend and fellow political junkie’s opinion)

People, especially men, are always ready to think a woman is weak or too emotional. Actually, I think she should find someone who is moderate and acceptable to many moderate Republicans. It’s too bad Huntsman is a Republican; I thought he was very credible. I think Huntsman would have been a far better candidate for the Republicans than Romney. (*On the Sunday morning news talk shows, Joe Scarborough, et. al., described Romney as “a flawed candidate.”)

3) President Obama definitely has the “it” factor. The future is hard to predict but if he has any luck at all, I think he will go down as one of our most important, transformational and influential presidents. It’s not just because he is African-American; he’s smart and he sticks to his principles. True, he gave in on the Bush tax cuts once, but not until he was backed into a nearly impossible corner. Obama’s health care bill is not perfect; the Republicans are responsible for watering it down and making it less effective than it could have been. Still, as Biden said at the time, “This is a big f***** deal.”

4)I am hoping that Mitch McConnell is beaten in a primary fight; I’m hoping that instead his district is represented by an Aiken or a Murdock. It would be fitting. What an &***&& McConnell is!
________________

(Me again, the Associated Content Content Producer of the Year 2008 for Politics, if you wondered where this woman gets off, I’ve followed the primaries, in particular, closely since 2004 and also reported from inside the DNC, RNC, Ron Paul Rally for the Republic, Belmont Town Hall Meeting, and Rudy’s race in Florida (which was more of a stroll, really,) in 2008:

5) Where was I? Oh, yes, the relatability factor: Who could EVER think that a rich millionaire was more like “us?” There was a HILARIOUS clip from Letterman that showed Mitt commenting and it was devastatingly funny and devastatingly on target. There was also a very funny skit on Jimmy Fallon where Obama says to Mitt (Fallon) something like, “At least you created one job, Mitt…for me.”

6) Let us also not forget that Mitt never did release all of his tax returns, despite his own FATHER saying you had to release at least 10 to 12 years of same. This is a man who doesn’t even support his country to the extent that his vast wealth would allow him to do, through taxation. Yet he wanted us to elect him President of that country. He gave a good concession speech, but claimed he had not even written one, prior to election night.

I do hope this stunning defeat for Karl Rove puts him out of politics forever. He was 1 for 10. Sheldon Adelman lost $60 mill on the election. I LOVED the tape where Obama thanked the Chicago workers and teared up. [I only wish I had had the stamina and youth and know-how to HAVE BEEN one of them.]

7) Women: as we have discussed. Women in America like Obama and, while they might also have liked Romney as a person, the things he wanted to do were not in the best interests of modern women. I read that women went for Obama by a wide margin of something like 11% points. I think that people who are right-thinking people just really “liked” Obama, when compared to Mitt.

8) Did you read the piece about Ted Kennedy’s game plan when he ran against Romney in Massachusetts being resurrected again in this race? Take Mitt’s so-called “strength” (i.e., his business expertise) and find the people whose jobs he outsourced and let THEM tell it like it was! [I heard they found eighteen of them and some of them were so vehement that they couldn’t use the remarks on the air in the TV spots. (lol… And so it goes.]

6) They are predicting that AZ, that bastion of nut cases, may well become a blue state as it becomes more Hispanic. [Get ready, AZ.] And get rid of that woman Governor! Who did she think she was, shaking her finger in the face of the President of the United States like a scolding schoolmarm.

7) I feel we have “saved” the Supreme Court and it will now (potentially) re-address this ridiculous ruling about pouring $ into races. In case people didn’t notice, it didn’t work…although I did shell out a standard amount of his contributions for Obama, when asked. Most of Obama’s donors were in the $50 range. Doesn’t sound like much compared to $60 million of the $1 billion Rove and the gang raised and spent, but it’s still money out of my pocket. I also have, framed, the very first Obamacare announcement he made in Iowa City, the declaration of this now “law of the land.” I’m going to get it out and hang it up somewhere, since Obamacare is now here to stay. Did you see the “Newsweek,” that declared Obama to be “this generation’s Lincoln?” I hope that does not extend to Lincoln’s demise. I fear it. Some nutty female employee of a Cold Stone Creamery posted a rant with the “n” word and a veiled threat and lost her job, as well she should, for articulating such threats, idle or no. Then there are the petitions to secede from the South. (Maybe they could have Texas, with “W” there?) Sounds like Lincoln’s “a nation divided cannot stand” Civil War years 1861-1865.

8)

Antonio Villaraigosa, the Mayor of Los Angeles since 2005 and Chairman of the Democratic Party.

One person who has not been mentioned much in the political talk for 2016 is the Mayor of LA, with whom I posed back in 2008 inside the Pepsi Center in Denver, Antonio Villaraigosa. He is a good-looking Latino male, charming and handsome and has just completed a term as Chairperson of the DNC. On the downside, not unlike Bill Clinton, he has had a wandering eye. [Got caught in a scandal with a TV newswoman while in office.]

I listened to a woman on a Sunday talk show describe being inside McCormick Place on election night and I felt so bad that I could not pull that off. (Started too late to request passes after the Film Festival). She said that when it went up on the board that Ohio had broken for Obama, the place just was electric. How I wish I had been there! It was history in the making.

Instead, I went out, camera in hand, and tried to capture a few images of people in the city and spoke to some of these people anonymously. (Shopgirls, cabbies, people in a bar). And then I went on my merry way, because I WAS merry and happy and watching the returns in Chicago.

I was relatively quiescent in politics for years, because I was completely disillusioned by the death of JFK ; Howard Dean brought me back into politics, so, ostensibly, that makes me a liberal and proud of it. BUT, I voted for 2 Republicans on the local ballot, so maybe I’m a raging Independent?

From My Friend, Pam:

Mitt was a very weak candidate for many reasons, not the least of which was that he was completely out of touch with ordinary Americans. He made many, many gaffes. (Olympics, anyone?) Having previously thought him smart, I began to wonder about his intelligence.

It’s incredible to me that the Republicans seemed to think that Mitt could completely change his thinking on big, basic issues and no one would care or remember. The Reps thought Mitt’s business smarts would trump everything but Mitt never gave any specifics about how he was going to put everybody back to work. He never gave any specifics about how his budget plan could give tax cuts and still reduce the deficit. I think a lot of people feared he would take away the mortgage deduction and he probably would have. [After all, that is probably not very important to an ultra rich person.]

I am also very glad that all the billions spent by the Republicans did not get them very much. I’m glad that Karl Rove failed. I hope “Turd Blossom” (“W’s” nickname for him) goes away and stays away. 1 for 10 is NOT a good average. So much for his much-vaunted expertise and the whining that Rush has done on the radio and the accusations that the pollsters were “oversampling” Democrats. The pollsters got it right. The Republican party got it wrong.

Women are over half of the population and they are in the ascendancy. I just read in the paper now that more women have driver’s licenses than men. Women demand safe, fuel efficient cars and that will be good for the environment.

The Republicans whom Obama reached out to on election night (Boehner and McConnell) would not even come to the phone. The message to the newly re-elected president was that “they were asleep,” despite the fact that the election was called for Obama fairly early in the evening (8:30-ish).

They were asleep, all right. Old and asleep.

As a party they did not even recognize that a freight train of change was bearing down on them until it ran over them. Women. Minorities. The regular guy. The changing face of America. Charisma of the candidate. Smart tactics. Superior strategical advantage(s). A nod to Hurricane Sandy.

There goes 2012. And I hope someone burns that piece-of-trash movie “Obama’s America” for the smear job it was.

Go see Stephen Spielberg’s “Lincoln,” instead. It’s closer to what Obama faces now.

Schilling vs. Bustos Race: Most $$$ in Super Pac Spending in Illinois

If you are a resident of the Quad Cities, you might find it interesting to learn that the Schilling/Bustos race in the 17th Congressional District in Illinois has attracted $9.2 million in Super Pac spending.

The closest to it is the 11th District (Biggert vs. Foster).

After that the money comes out in this order in the Congressional races in Illinois:

$6.6 million in 12th District involving Plummer vs. Enyart

$6.4 million in 10th District involving Dold vs. Schneider.

$6.3 million in 13th District involving David vs. Gill.

And, last, and, surprisingly least, $5.5 million in 8th district with amputee veteran Tammy Duckworth running against the bombastic Joe Walsh.

Of course, all of this pales next to the 333 ads a day now running in Ohio. Still, without all that SuperPac money, which has surpassed $2 million in Illinois’ top 6 competitive Congressional races and has allowed Tea Party incumbent Bobby Schilling to send out a newsletter that makes him look like a Democrat, angering many true Democrats who received it, and, also, to put out a false ad accusing candidate Cheri Bustos of having anything to do with a road to Short Hills Country Club (to which she does not even belong).

And so it goes.

Movie “Flight” with Director Robert Zemeckis in a Q&A at the Chicago Film Festival, Oct.25th, 2012

Robert Zemeckis’ new movie “Flight,” starring Denzel Washington as a somewhat Sully-like pilot closed the 48th Chicago Film Festival in style on Thursday, October 25, 2012. Zemeckis and wife Leslie came to town to accept the Founder’s Award in conjunction with the film, which opens wide on November 2, 2012.

In the action-packed mystery thriller, Denzel Washington stars as Whip Whitaker, a pilot who makes a miraculous crash landing of Flight 227 near Atlanta, Georgia, a plane bearing 102 passengers and crew.

The opening sequence is as exciting as the crash in “Castaway” but goes on much longer. It’s truly riveting. When the plane is down and Denzel (and the others) are being rescued from the wreckage, he is initially hailed as a hero. Co-star Bruce Greenwood as an old friend who represents the pilots’ union says, “Initial reports look like you saved a lot of lives.” Drug-dealer and hippie Harley Mays (John Goodman) says, “Sweet Jesus! What a stud that plot is! You will never pay for a drink again. You’re a rock star!”

The euphoric reaction to Whitaker’s calm command during the crisis quickly gives way to a variety of charges that could land him in prison if he doesn’t perform satisfactorily during the NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board) review of the crash. He must testify in a public setting before Ellen Block (Oscar-winner Melissa Leo). Whip’s answers at that time will mark his future for all time.

The movie has much discussion of God or a Divine Being. One of Zemeckis’ personal quotes on the International Movie Data Base gives us a bit of insight into why that might be: “I was raised a Catholic on the South Side of Chicago (Roseland), and I felt I had to undo a lot of serious damage. But as I was getting older (Zemeckis is now 61), I began coming off my absolutely young, arrogant, agnostic beliefs. I was thinking more about coming to terms with human spirituality.”

One character in the script says, “Once you realize all the random things in your life, you realize there is a God and you have no control over that. Death gives you perspective.” Later, the line is, “I believe that God landed that plane.” Don Cheadle, who plays Denzel’s lawyer, Hugh Lange, is working on getting an Act of God inserted as a potential cause of the accident, and Denzel says, “Whose God would do this?” as he surveys the wreckage of his plane, sitting in the field where he landed it. Denzel’s old flying buddy (Bruce Greenwood) refers to the successful landing as “a miracle.” Denzel’s co-pilot, post crash, says, “That crash was pre-ordained. There’s only one judge, and he’s got a plan for you. Nothing happens in the Kingdom of the Lord by mistake.” John Gatins wrote the script, which had been kicking around Hollywood for a while.

In the Q&A following the film, Zemeckis said, “The writer wrote the first pages in 1999. I had heard that Denzel Washington was interested in it. When I read it in February of 2011, I was astounded at how beautiful the script was. So I called up Denzel to see if he was really interested in doing it.”

Q: What was it like working with Denzel Washington? And was he really naked?

A: Sure. He’s the real deal. There’s no vanity. He shows up with the goods every single day. He is very focused, very intense.

Q: Are you a tough director?

A: Only if the actors aren’t doing what I want them to. The trick is mutual respect and collaboration. I don’t like to stir things up. I like it calm. There was a lot of preparation before shooting on the day that he would show up. Every choice he (Denzel) would make was perfect.

Q: Did you do a lot of takes?

A; I do as many as it takes to get what I want.

Q: You’ve done just about every kind of film: “Romancing the Stone” (1984); “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?” (1988); “1941” (1979); “Back to the Future” (1985); “Forrest Gump” (1994); “Contact” (1997); “The Polar Express” (2004). Would you do a musical?

A: Sure.

Q: What was the inspiration for the film?

A: The screenplay. I read a lot. Most screenplays aren’t very good. I just couldn’t put this one down. I just loved how complex it was.

Q: How important was the casting?

A: The tightrope that we were all on was that he (Captain Whip Whitaker) was such a morally despicable character but very good at his job. He was very flawed. Denzel Washington brings this great screen presence. Denzel has charm and great gravitas as an actor. He had everything that was needed to pull the character off. (Zemeckis had just declined to select another actor who might have played the role, in answering a question from an audience member, saying, “Once the camera turns, I can’t imagine any other cast that can do the parts.”

Q: This isn’t a film about a plane crash.

A: It’s not.

Q: Did you have any problems with the product placements in the film?

A: We spread the brands all around. We had no problems.

Q: How much change was there from the beginning of shooting to the end of shooting?

A: I always saw him (the protagonist) as a flawed character that had to get in touch with his humanness. Through changes in location, sound mixing, etc. there were changes, but the big stuff is always there…the big story beats.

Q: John Goodman is remarkable in his supporting role as drug-dealer Harley Mays.

A: I was just praying that he’d be available.

Q: Is Denzel’s character a hero?

A: I think, in movie terms, he’s an anti-hero. He’s very good at some things, but he’s very flawed. I love the moral ambiguity. No one wears a black hat. No one wears a white hat. Everybody is ambiguous and I just thought that was fascinating.

A questioner from the audience asked if Zemeckis would ever do more hand-held camera footage. His answer was, “In fact, Don Burgess, my cinematographer and I decided there would be different levels of camera style for Denzel’s state in the film. When he is sober, the camera is locked off. When he has a buzz on, the camera shots are floaty. When he is completely drunk, the shots are hand-held. All film techniques should disappear and be there to serve the characters and the story.”

Q: How did the soundtrack come about?

A: The soundtrack grew out of John Goodman’s character, who likes to listen to the Rolling Stones’ “Gimme Shelter’ in his car. Whit (Denzel) didn’t have music in his life. The Rolling Stones just felt right.

Five years ago, “Entertainment Weekly” magazine named Robert (Bob) Zemeckis Number 18 on its list of “the smartest people in Hollywood.” From his very first start (with co-writer and collaborator Bob Gale) when they sold an episode of “Kolchak: The Night Stalker, Chopper (#1.15) in 1975, Zemeckis has gone on to give us some of the best films in recent memory.

Zemeckis has returned from experimentation with digital movie-making in “The Polar Express” 8 years ago (“I just love all types of movies, but I was especially interested in digital cinema. I was interested in films that could be done in digital.”) to a more traditional film that ranks right up there with the best of this year.

Viola Davis Receives Career Achievement Award at 48th Chicago Film Festival

Viola Davis in Chicago arriving to receive her Career Achievement Award on October 22nd, 2012.

Viola Davis (“The Help,” “Doubt”) was honored at the 28th Chicago Film Festival on Monday, October 22, 2012, with a Career Achievement Award during the Black Perspectives evening. She was introduced by television reporter Robin Roberts and interviewed by fellow actress Regina Taylor.

Here were some of her remarks:

Q: Tell us about background.

A: I was born in St. Matthews, South Carolina (on the former Singleton Plantation), delivered by my grandmother, but we moved to Central Falls, Rhode Island when I was 2 months old, in 1965. I have 4 sisters and a brother and I am the second from the youngest.

Q: Did any of your siblings want to act?

A: Oh, yes. My younger sister Diane went to Howard to study acting, but she eventually decided, “I need to have a steady job with insurance and that sort of thing, and gave it up.”

Q: By what route did you come to acting?

A: Well, when you grow up in abject poverty, the only black family in town, it allows you to express yourself.

Q: Who was influential in your becoming an actress?

A: Well, Cicely Tyson, when I saw her in “The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman.” Watching her entertain and create a fully rounded human being. At age 6 I said, “That’s what I want to do. Plus, there was my sister’s storytelling of living in the segregated South.

Q: Education?

A: I went to college at Central Falls College in Rhode Island and graduated in 1988, but then I gave myself a year off to “find myself” before I went to Julliard Drama School for 4 years.

Q: Did you have certain mentors?

A: Yeah. Sure. Sometimes, though, you find it in moments, not in people. I always looked for the ropes. Me trying to fit into the classical very white training that Julliard has (Chekhov, Ibsen, etc.) was difficult. Sometimes, they try to pretend that you’re not black or that you’re not yourself. You go out onstage to audition and you try not to have a broad nose. You try to be the cute one. It takes imagination.

Q: You did find your voice?

A: It took me some time and it behooves me to be an observer. We don’t recognize the truth any more, sometimes. I need the truth. I need the moment when Troy (Denzel Washington in the play “Fences”) tells Rose (Viola’s part opposite Denzel as his wife) that he’s been seeing another woman and is going to have a baby with her.”

Q: Let’s go back to the beginning.

Viola Davis and her husband of 9 years, Julius Tennon, in Chicago on October 22nd, 2012.

A: I was in “City of Angels” and I kept saying of a TV part, “I’m Nurse Lynette Peeler”…”OR1! OR!” Sometimes, as the old saying goes, you have to kiss some frogs to find your prince. (Viola shared that she met her husband, Julius Tennon,whom she has been married to since 2003, she met onset during her “OR1” days). Then, I did “Antwone Fisher” in 2002.

Q: Do you think silence is an important thing in your acting?

A: Silence is just as much a part of what we do (as actors). What is happening in silence is a part of the dialogue. Silence is interior dialogue, versus exterior dialogue.

Q: But you made the mother in “Antwone Fisher” very human.

A: Yes, absolutely.

Q: You play complex roles. Was there ever a time when you thought, “I can’t do this!”

A: Every time I say, “ I can’t do it. I just can’t do it.” I said that with “The Help.” I’m anal and neurotic about the narrative. I know that sometimes the political message is what comes through rather than the execution. For instance, me being caught in the role of being a black maid with a broken dialect in the 60s…I knew it would be controversial. Anthony Hopkins can play Hannibal Lector (in “Silence of the Lambs”) and just walk into a great narrative and humanize someone. So many of the roles where you have to create it internally (not externally) don’t get the glory. They just don’t. Without you saying a word, it is a dialogue when you’re acting. You have to problem solve. It’s not always on the page.

Q: But you did (problem solve the role of Aibileen) and brilliantly. How has that role changed things for you?

A: My whole life changed because “The Help” made money. What changed after that is that I have more power to walk into a room and possibly push some buttons to get a part. But everything is in the narrative. It’s gotta’ be on the page. If it’s not on the page, I can’t create it. It’s like having a great body but only $10 to go to the store to buy clothes. You cannot show who you are without a great narrative. That’s why I’m founding a production company (with her husband). We have optioned some material on Harriet Tubman and Sam Rockwell is attached. And we have an option on something dealing with Barbara Jordan.

[At this point, a clip from the film “Solaris” with George Clooney was shown. The 2002 film, directed by Steven Soderbergh, was a bit like Ray Bradbury’s “Mars Is Heaven.” It was written, says Viola by a Polish science fiction writer. I saw the film, and it was confusing, at best, with Natascha McElhone playing Clooney’s wife who is dead, but the bizarre planet the research station is orbiting makes him think she is still alive. The film was not a commercial or critical success.]

Following the clip, Viola said:

That role definitely fits under the category of not knowing what-the-hell I was doing! My character in the book was an old white Polish guy. The only thing it was about was this planet, which was a metaphor for science. We don’t know what-the-hell we’re talking about (in that scene).

Q: How is Steven Soderbergh as a director?

A: I love him. He gets me. He is very calm. That’s why people become your friends and walk into your life. He (Soderbergh) explains things in a very simple way. I think he’s a great director.

Q: We met when you were appearing in “7 Guitars” here in town, and I came backstage to meet you.

Actresses Viola Davis (L) and Regina Taylor (R) in Chicago on the Red Carpet on October 22nd, 2012.

A: Yes…people said to me: “You look like Regina Taylor.” I remember I was freezing to death, but I’m at the Goodman doing this play, and I was so happy.

Q: What is the biggest difference between working on the stage and working on film?

A: I was such a purist that I would never look in the mirror (when doing plays). I’m so aware of what I’m projecting onscreen. Onscreen, you have to be smaller (in your gestures and facial expressions.) I’m watching myself more (for film). I find myself more aware of containment. You have to be really honest. Every once in a while, if it’s there, I can explode.

A clip of Viola’s Oscar-nominated role opposite Meryl Streep (and Philip Seymour Hoffman) in “Doubt” is shown, and she responds to the question, “What were you doing in that scene with Meryl Streep?”

A: I was watching Meryl Streep! I had seen the play. It was a really hard audition. We went from Los Angeles to New York City and I thought I was one of only a couple actresses who were being put in costume and make-up for the audition, but, when I got to New York City, there were 4 or 5 others, all of us dressed as Mrs. Miller in hair and make-up. How nerve-racking to be on a stage with 5 other Mrs. Millers and to hear them audition and to listen while people applauded and said things like, “She really knocked it out of the park! The play (“Doubt”) is not just about the Catholic Church. It’s a litmus test about how we judge others. That is the Number One issue I have. I want to play a person—not political roles or symbols. I thought it was more interesting if I played Mrs. Miller as a person with a Sophie’s choice—the lesser of two evils. She is feeling, “I really believe my son is gay.” Some suggested I should play her as colder, but I know women who will literally give their kids money for heroin rather than watch them go through the hell of withdrawal.

Q: Where were you when you learned you had been Oscar nominated as Best Supporting Actress for your 11 minutes onscreen in “Doubt?”

A: I was at the Four Seasons with a bottle of champagne.

Q: What happens when you become an Oscar nominee?

A: Well, it starts with Broadcast Film Critics’ awards. It starts about the end of October and ends at the Academy Awards. By the time you get to the Oscars, you’ve probably already won a SAG award and then you do 12 hours of interviews.

(A clip is shown of Aibileen Clark in “The Help” facing down Hilly and being fired.)

“I tried to buy the rights to ‘The Help” when I heard about the book. I thought I could throw $500 at the writer/director, but I went from trying to buy the rights to begging to be in the movie.”

Q: What was the press circuit like?

A: The press circuit taught me to find my voice. I knew it was going to happen that this would be controversial. I was smart enough to figure that out ahead of time. I had never experienced having to defend any of my role choices. It’s like wigs. I like wigs, and I have a lot of them and will probably wear them again, but every time I put one on, I felt like I was doing “Jay Leno” again. I was forcing people to see me differently. There comes a time in your life when you can’t force people to see you. You have to be yourself and like yourself, and that’s when people like you.

Q: People don’t understand the fights that we have to have during the creative process.

A: True. It gave me power in knowing that. There are a lot of actors I admired in the past who had the narratives and made them work. I’m not gonna’ throw the baby out with the bathwater. I can’t do that. I’m here to humanize it, not to judge it. I had to constantly reiterate that throughout my journey with “The Help.”

Q: What was it like to be nominated alongside Meryl Streep?

A: Listen, I’ve been doing this for 25 years. I am humble, but at some time I have to step into the experienced artist that I am. I think that confidence and humility can exist alongside each other. But, after the Oscar nomination, the thing that came to my mind was, “Now what?” Is this a destination or is it a key to opening the door to great roles for women who look like me. I think it was Kathy Bates who called it “the Oscar curse.” She said that after she won for “Misery” her phone didn’t ring for 2 years. Does this mean more work? All of these things are up in the air. I want what Meryl Streep and Diane Lane and other actresses want. There’s room for all types of narratives. I stand in solidarity with them. I want expansive storylines for you, for me, for Gabourey Sidibe, for Monique.

Viola shared with Chicago “Tribune” critic Michael Phillips in an interview (October 19, 2012) that she and her husband are forming their own production company, as Tom Cruise and others have done.

(To Michael Phillips): “Onscreen, I have had so many great experiences, but, like a lot of people, I feel I haven’t yet had the role that reflects all I can do. I look at that young actress from ‘Beasts of the Southern Wild’ (Quvenzhasne Wallis) and I think to myself: Okay, let’s fantasize. Let’s say she gets an Academy Award nomination. Let’s imagine then that she wins the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress. What’s next? What’s out there for her? What’s going to carry her throughout her career—through her teens and her 40’s and 60s?”

This is why Viola Davis and husband Julius Tennon have established their own production company. But it substantially represents a bigger issue.

It occurred to me at this point that Viola was articulating the age-old quest for roles for mature female actresses in Hollywood. The problem is that there doesn’t seem to be as wide an audience for mature films as once existed.

With the price of movie tickets skyrocketing and home theaters becoming more popular with video-on-demand and Netflix and streaming movies and the competition from HBO and Showtime and other diversions, only the young who are going out on a date flock to theaters. And even the young often have to be lured there by promises of 3D or some other gimmick.

This is apt to get worse, not better, as audiences age and stay at home more for their movie viewing experience. No longer is the shared audience experience desired, especially if the person next to you is texting or talking on his cell phone throughout the film.

At a recent commercial film I attended in a small town (the latest of the Bourne films), all 4 of the previews that preceded the showing were for horror films aimed at a young audience. Almost none of my friends in the older demographic are film buffs. The film that lures the middle-aged (or older) consumer who is not in the big city is rare. Add to the cost of a ticket the parking fee(s) incurred at places like the AMC parking lot ($36 if you go over 4 hours is the norm, although the festival has managed to negotiate a discount down to $18) and you have a ticket price (forget the overpriced snacks) that is high, a parking fee (in Chicago) that is astronomical, and a very expensive evening at a time when the economy—(in case the politicians haven’t mentioned it in the past 30 seconds)—is not going well.

Normally, I attend films in the Illinois/Iowa Quad Cities, where we park for free and have $3 Wednesday matinees, but the best films that Viola Davis may make would possibly never play there. So the cities like Chicago are where Viola’s movies will need to be seen, and, (although the Icon on Roosevelt hasn’t started charging for parking—yet) I wonder if audiences that genuinely want to see quality film performances will patronize the films that Viola Davis’ production company will make, overcoming all the obstacles in their way to do so.

I hope so, because Viola Davis is a genuine artist. Her performance onstage in “Fences” on Broadway opposite Denzel Washington as Rose (which I saw from the front row) was a true revelation.

“Cloud Atlas:” Read What the Directors Had to Say About It

The trans-gender Lana (previously Larry) Wachowski pictured on the Red Carpet with Chicago Film Festival founder and director Michael Kutza on October 16th, 2012.

The Brothers Wachowski— (who are now brother and sister, as the 47-year-old Larry has become Lana)—allied with Director/Composer Tom Tykwer (“Run, Lola, Run”) and friends since 1999 when “The Matrix” and “Run, Lola, Run” came out, visited the Chicago Film Festival to screen the festival’s centerpiece film, “Cloud Atlas.” The movie opens wide on October 26, 2012.

Tom Hanks (wearing what looked like a woman’s shawl) and Halle Berry in “Cloud Atlas.”

A sweeping tale based on an equally ambitious 2004 book by David Mitchell, the movie has attracted critical praise tempered with some criticism of its execution. Executing it at all required the trio to travel to Costa Rica and lay out index cards on the floor, in an attempt to reconfigure the way the novel is written.

When Mitchell wrote the sweeping epic, it was puzzle-like. It takes 6 interwoven storylines and spans 500 years and several genres. The novel recounts the 6 interrelated story lines chronologically until the middle of the book. In the middle of the book, the sequence reverses.

Lana Wachowski makes a point during the Q&A that followed the screening of “Cloud Atlas.” (Oct. 16, 2012).

Lana Wachowski read the book and felt it would be a good project for the 3 filmmakers who had been looking for a joint project. Ultimately, filming took place in Germany, Scotland and the Spanish island of Majorca, beginning in September 2011.

Among the pluses for the film: its stellar cast, which includes Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Hugh Grant, and Korean star Doona Bae playing multiple roles. The minuses? Cohesion of the story line and financing. As Andy Wachowski told the Chicago “Tribune” in an October 14th interview, “People were blown away by the concept and blown away by the cast, but they wouldn’t give us any money.” Ultimately, the directors had to ante up 10% of the $102 million-dollar budget.

Brother and sister Lana (47) and Andy (44) Wachowski appear during the Q&A after “Cloud Atlas.”

The division of labor for the interwoven story lines broke down to Tykwer directing the early 20th century composer plot line, the 1973 thriller, and the contemporary caper about an aging book publisher, which provides the comic relief in the film. (When the elderly gentleman, who is intent on escaping from a nursing home his brother—played by Hugh Grant— has committed him to passes the window, he shouts, “Soylent Green is people!” from the Charlton Heston film; one of the many previous sci-fi films whose ideas are recycled, along with “Logan’s Run”.) The Wachowskis handled the 1849 sea story and two stories set in a futuristic world of 2144, which uses “Logan’s Run” Carousel concept of the doomed thinking they are going to their great reward, when they are really scheduled for death. The aerial shot of the look-alike Korean clones reminded of “Metropolis” cinematically.

The 6 story lines were:

1) Dr. Goose (Tom Hanks) administering medicine onboard ship to naïve traveler Adam Ewing (Jim Sturgess) in 1849 in the South Pacific. The slave trade flourishes at this time and a stowaway slave figures in the plot. Not my favorite of the plots

2) 1936 Scotland where Robert Frobisher (Ben Whishaw), a poor musician, reads Ewing’s journals from aboard ship while working for a noted composer. The “Cloud Atlas” composition that Frobisher composes (and the elderly composer attempts to steal) is quite lovely and was actually composed by Tom Tykwer and his regular musical collaborators, Johnny Klimek and Reinhold Heil. Among my favorites of the sub-plots.

3) Luisa Rey (Halle Berry) is a journalist investigating a nuclear reactor and becomes the object of an assassination attempt by Bill Smoke (Hugo Weaving). She hears “Cloud Atlas” in a record store in California in 1973. An interesting plot.

4) Timothy Cavendish (Jim Broadbent), a vanity publisher trying to escape the nursing home his brother (Hugh Grant) has consigned him to in 2012 Scotland. He is considering publishing Rey’s story. The film’s only humorous character.

5) Sonmi-451 (Doona Bae), a Korean clone who toils in Papa Song’s diner in 2144. She sees a TV movie on the life of Cavendish and, from there, goes on to become a revolutionary and, in the primitive island on which one version of Tom Hanks lives, worshipped as a Divine Being.

6) Meronym (Berry) and Zachry (Hanks) on an island in 4th century Hawaii where civilization is primitive, cannibals roam, and Sonmi is worshipped as a Goddess. Needs subtitles.

If comparisons to other films are made, among those mentioned is “Babel” by Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, which was critically acclaimed for its complicated storylines that intersect (Brad Pitt and Gwynneth Paltrow starred), but only earned $35 million in profits. Others might mention Daren Aronofsky’s “The Fountain,” which earned $10 million. On the positive side, Christopher Nolan’s “Inception” earned $292 million, so perhaps there is hope for the film to earn more than just plaudits. Another film I would compare this one to is “Magnolia,” that had seemingly random events contributing to plot developments and earned Tom Cruise an Oscar nomination. Others might include last year’s Terrance Malick film “Tree of Life” in the category “artistic films that took on big themes and tried to translate them to the big screen, with mixed results.” [While a critical success, the film was not a commercial success.] As the moderator of the Q&A put it, “An uncompromising work of artistic integrity.” (They probably also said that about “Holy Motors,” one of the worst films ever, but winner of some big awards.)

In the Q&A following the film, here is what the directors shared:

Q: What convinced you to put in 4 and ½ years making this film?

A: (from Lana) We wanted to spend time with one another, so it was actually fun! (She went on to say that the trio had been searching for a vehicle for the 3 of them since 1999). Andy Wachowski interrupted his sister with, “We wanted a movie that tested the most stalwart bladder.” (The film is 164 minutes long).

Added Lana: The book—there was something about it that took my breath away, that was so delicious, that we wanted to savor it. The book touched us because we kept trying to connect. This book speaks to the implied desire to connect and to speak to the future and to be in dialogue with the past…David Mitchell loves literary forms so much. He has this post-modern energy. There’s this way to love storytelling. He has energy and a narrative drive, but he is still trying to explore the human condition in a philosophical way. But you can also make it a thinking and entertaining movie. These don’t have to be separated. You don’t have to say, “This is a thinking movie; this is for people who don’t like to think.” As Lana Wachowski told Rebecca Keegan of the Chicago “Tribune” in the December 14, 2012 interview: “There was a time when movies were funny and sad and dramatic and slapsticky and challenging and thought-provoking all at the same time. That would be one movie. Now you break that all up into a comedy, a romance, and a drama. With ‘Cloud Atlas’ we were thinking: It could be everything.”

Tom Tykwer, the co-director said: We felt very attracted to it because there were a multitude of voices. It was an experiment. If we failed, then we failed. If we can write together, we feel we can do anything together. Identifying ways to get into the novel was a step-by-step process.

This led Lana Wachowski to describe the Costa Rica index card method, (with the cards on the floor.) She said, “We had to re-arrange the way the novel is written. The novel is in bigger chunks. It will have 60 pages with one character and then jump to another character. We felt that would not work in the movie.”

Andy Wachowski: “The whole process was this act of love for the book and our love for each other and that carried us all the way to the end.”

The moderator commented on the line from the film, “Isn’t an ocean a multitude of drops? “ He referenced the many acts of kindness in the film.

Lana: If something so horrific as the Second World War and the Holocaust can’t kill kindness, you will never kill kindness. Extend yourself. This idea is what has really propelled us. Still, as pessimistic as we can be, we don’t think of Pollyanna endings. You believe that there is someone that is going to be affected. It’s a great reason to believe in the future.

The first question from the audience was from a woman who had a good friend who underwent sex change surgery. She asked Lana Wachowski: “Is there a certain significance in your gender change affecting your artistic choices?”

Lana: “This is getting very personal right away.” She went on to say, “David Mitchell is not transgender. The novel is not about transgender identities. But we have always been interested in material that transcends convention. And I was probably the first one to say, ‘Hey! That male character can actually play this female role over here.’ (Which occurs when Hugh Grant plays a Nurse Ratched sort in a nursing home). I may have had an attraction to specifically transcending the idea of gender in this film.”

Q: How did you pick who directed what?

A: (Lana) “ In the deconstruction of the stories, the experience is not the same. During that time, your mind is making all these connections. We would find all this interconnectivity in the stories.”

(Andy) “Our feeling is we all directed it together. (Lana made a joking comment about the Directors’ Guild not being quite as flexible, at this point.) It was a four-year process. We shot it together. We wrote it together. We edited it together. We were only apart for 3 months.”

(Tom): “You’re playing a genetic stream, a string in the film.” (There is much talk of déjà vu and the idea of reincarnation would certainly play into the film’s themes.)

Q: Do you experience emotion watching your movie again?

A: (Lana) “It’s a P.R. situation. I would have been crying and my make-up would run.” (She pantomimed crying at the movie “Fried Green Tomatoes”). Lana digressed to point out the Wachowskis’ parents in the theater (the duo is from Chicago) and say, “We’d cut school and go to triple features.”

A: (Tom) “It’s considered to be embarrassing to still like your own movie. There are moments where I think, ‘That’s my—or our—influence.’ The last 1/3 of the film Doona Bae was so unbelievable in the last 20 minutes. There’s this weird way of being touched. I feel like we sort of set the stage. I can still watch it as though I’ve never done it. There were things that the actors offered to us that were really beyond our expectations. I’m still touched.”

Q: What was most daunting: making the book into a screenplay or making the screenplay into a movie?

A: (Lana) “Showing it to David Mitchell.”

A: (Andy) “Making the film was staggering. It was an independent film, with money coming in from all over the world.”

A: (Lana): “Four days before we were to start, another financier went under, and we all had to put up our own personal money. Ten percent of the contingency was our money.”

A: (Andy): “Four days in Halle Berry broke her foot.”

A: (Lana): “It was daunting, but we couldn’t NOT make the movie. It was such an act of love for the material and the actors. It was strangely joyful, even in the midst of everything falling apart.”

A: (Andy) “For every bad thing that happened, a good thing would happen.”

There was some discussion of how excited David Mitchell was to be involved in helping design the futuristic spaceships in the film’s futuristic sequence.

My take:

I enjoyed the film, but I also found it difficult to follow and often confusing. The weakest performances, overall, for me, were from Tom Hanks. His Dr. Goose played like broad farce, and his native on the island seemed to be wearing a woman’s knitted shawl. His gangster (Hanks unleashed the “F-bomb” on live TV on ABC while supposedly speaking in character) was unconvincing. The language created for Hanks and the island natives was also difficult to decipher without subtitles. (I did better with the movie from Iceland that had subtitles.)

The parts I enjoyed most seem to have been supervised by Tom Tykwer (“Run, Lola, Run”) whose “Cloud Atlas” music—so central to the plot— was lush and lovely. His portions of the story were, for me, the best. (I especially enjoyed the comic relief of the nursing home escape featuring Jim Broadbent).

Having said that, the sets and spaceships and futuristic touches that the Wachowski Brothers gave us in “The Matrix” (back when they were still two brothers) were matched here by the visual effects portraying clones in the year 2144 (Method Studios Visual Effects, Vancouver, B.C.)

It will be interesting to see if the film makes back its investment, but at least the Wachowskis —who have been notoriously loathe to promote films at festivals in the past—can now say that their film played the Chicago Film Festival, because they revealed during the Q&A that they submitted student films many years ago that didn’t make the cut.

Page 109 of 160

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén